Re: Absolut Pile (German posting)

29May06

 
Ralf Westphal schrieb:

>> Nenne mir bitte einen Grund, warum ein Pile_Object nicht einmal Child
>> und dann (eben nicht gleichzeitig!) — immer Deine Probleme
>> mit der Zeit
>>

>
> natürlich kann eine relation einmal child sein kann (ist sie ja immer -
> außer bei tops) und dann aber auch parent. und sie kann auch parent zu
> beliebigen children [...]

Filed under: Pile   |  Leave a Comment

From “The .Net Abstraction Pile” to The Pile Abstraction Pile

24May06

Talking about two sided forms (German: Zwei-Seiten-Formen), is talking about abstractions.
"An abstraction is a boundary with two sides."
That is the first sentence of this blog post by Eric Sink, titled "The .NET Abstraction Pile". The points of his article are:

Good technology decision making requires you to know what's going on underneath [...]

Filed under: LoF, Pile   |  Leave a Comment

This This

24May06

(Look|Hear|Perceive) There is this…
There is another this… (at another There).
Two This' side by side: This This.
ThisThis at one There

Filed under: Pile, Poem   |  2 Comments

http://www.lawsofform.de/

23May06

Andreas Mertens started a new blog under the domain lawsofform.de. 

Filed under: LoF   |  Leave a Comment

Four Types of Pile_Objects

22May06

Filed under: LoF, Logic, Pile   |  Leave a Comment

Bootstrap of a Pile System

21May06

The figure above shows the situation in which Pile_Object No. 2 is identified. It "is" a child of two yet unidentified parents. While pointing to another Pile_Object by means of the Cp2 of Pile_Object No. 2, we let behave Pile_Object 2 as a parent. We let behave Cp2(No.3) as a parent too (can only point [...]

Filed under: LoF, Logic, Pile   |  1 Comment

First Axiom of George Alexander Stathis’ Multiple Form Logic as Pile_Objects

20May06

After a dialogue with my partner last night — many thanks Christel! — I'm able to illustrate the first axiom of George Alexander Stathis' Multiple Form Logic
(A1) 1 , X = 1
("All is One, and All contains any distinction")
with a Pile notation:

Filed under: LoF, Logic, Pile   |  1 Comment

Multiple Form Logic

19May06

A is an entire expression, "X#1,Y".
See Stathis 2003 – Multiplicity in Multiple Form Logic :
The Axioms of Multiple Form Logic:
(A1) 1 , X = 1
("All is One, and All contains any distinction")
(A2) A # X # X = A
("A distinction distinguishing itself, is no distinction")
(A3) A [...]

Filed under: LoF, Logic, Pile   |  6 Comments

Pile Concepts, N and A…

18May06

From the perspective of a Pile_Object, any other Pile_Object is first of
all an unidentified other Pile_Object (or child). To define another
Pile_Object, we need two Pile_Objects, i.e. three in sum. Pile_Object#1
now takes the role of a Cp2 (Pile jargon for: a combinative pointer).
Let’s point to another Pile_Object (= #2, or child). Hm…. but there
are two places, [...]

Filed under: Pile   |  Leave a Comment

Pliant Pile Systems

16May06

Who wants to get bogged down in the debate, whether Pile is trivial? After you did understand it, you could say,
"It really took me a while before I understood what he was drawing… but in the end I think it´s so simple and straightforward as to signify something important."
or, that you have seen this concepts [...]

Filed under: Pile   |  Leave a Comment